Stephen+curry+underrated+repack

Further reading and angles to explore (topics for follow-up posts)

The “Stephen Curry underrated repack” only exists because we keep using the wrong tools to measure him. We try to fit a square revolution into a round history book. We ask if he can post up (he doesn’t need to). We ask if he can defend the rim (he’s a guard). We ask why he doesn’t average triple-doubles (because gravity doesn’t show on a stat sheet). stephen+curry+underrated+repack

In the latest iteration of the underrated repack, the debate has shifted to late-game execution. A persistent myth—that Curry isn’t “clutch” because he takes deep threes instead of mid-range shots—has been systematically dismantled by tracking data. Further reading and angles to explore (topics for

By 2016, Curry shattered reality. 402 three-pointers. 30.1 PPG on 50/45/90 shooting. The first and only unanimous MVP in history. Surely, the repack was complete? No. Because immediately after he was crowned, a new underrating mechanism emerged: “He’s a product of Kerr’s system.” We ask if he can defend the rim (he’s a guard)